A Google attorney told a federal judge today that the two sides involved in the long-running Google Book Search lawsuit settlement are negotiating an “opt-in settlement” in an attempt to finally put the case to rest.
As The Laboratorium reports, Google’s attorney Michael Boni told Judge Dennis Chin that both sides “have been aiming for an opt-in settlement.” That would likely please Chin, who specifically suggested when he rejected the original settlement in March that an opt-in settlement would be a good idea:
As the United States and other objectors have noted, many of the concerns raised in the objections would be ameliorated if the ASA were converted an “opt-out” to an “opt-in” settlement.I urge the parties to consider revising the ASA accordingly.
The case dates back to 2005, when many authors and publishers sued Google for copyright violations when Google began scanning books and showing snippets of their content in Google search results.
Chin set another hearing in the case for September 15th and warned the two sides that he’ll assign a “relatively tight schedule” if the case isn’t resolved, or close to it by that date.
Related Topics: Google: Book Search | Google: Legal | Legal: Copyright
About The Author: Matt McGee is Search Engine Land's Executive News Editor, responsible for overseeing our daily news coverage. His news career includes time spent in TV, radio, and print journalism. His web career continues to include a small number of SEO and social media consulting clients, as well as regular speaking engagements at marketing events around the U.S. He blogs at Small Business Search Marketing and can be found on Twitter at @MattMcGee and/or on Google Plus. See more articles by Matt McGee
View the original article here
This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.
Just a couple weeks after the latest setback, Google picked up a small but potentially important victory today in its defense against charges that the company violated federal wiretap laws when its Street View cars intercepted personal data over unencrypted WiFi networks.
